This is all true, and doesn’t even consider the fact that you can’t just trust random crowdsourced computations to be correct! A bad actor could absolutely mess with inference and affect the outcome to their advantage.
You’d need to either do something with zero-knowledge proofs (insanely computationally intensive), or have multiple independent people do the same work and cross-check the results (also extremely computationally expensive).
Thank you, fartsparkles, I didn’t know any of that.
It’s funny how this can both be a freeing thought and a criticism of how one dances.
Peel them first, we aren’t trying to get murdered here.
Earth United has a better ring to it.
I don’t even think they kill you, just death by natural causes.
I’d like to watch Arcane, Wheel of Time, and Lower Decks, to name a few.
… That’s like $100,000 a person. Not to mention transportation costs, costs to house them while in custody, cost to apprehend them.
Makes absolutely no sense. Spend $100k on anyone, and you can make them into a valuable, productive member of society (assuming they weren’t already).
Oh boy, that brings me back… After they blocked net send, well, let’s just say my school board’s internal single sign-on had an SQL injection vulnerability and plaintext passwords…
I’m always excited by these kinds of headlines! I hope they stick with open source and don’t switch back.
Applications where adding an AI chatbot is useful are significantly less common than liquid soap dispensers.
y pgang rise up