An American who doesn’t understand the concept of per capita. That is certainly new. /s

Drones.

He doesn’t have to. He already lives in the oligarchy which is the US.

Don’t you think it is a bit harsh to accuse people who doesn’t like musicals of being sociopaths?

It is funny how you guys always becomes complete fans of the “lesser evil”. As if it is not actually considered the “lesser evil” by you, but “the absolute best and most fantastic thing that exists”.

OP certainly rustled some tankie jimmies. It is a glorious to behold how they came here to whine and whatabout about it as they do.

That is not OP’s point. Their point is the opposite, namely that a lot of people automatically distrust people (women) based on their gender. Lots of women have provided credible evidence under oath:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

Well, it deserved to be pissed on, so it is a shame it was not the actual Alamo. Bunch of traitorous slavers.

Your strawman has nothing to do with the subject at hand. The fact that you resort to this obfuscation instead of actually facing the problem, suggests that perhaps your personal conviction is not so rational as you initially thought.

It’ll settle down eventually into just being a part of normal life.

There is absolutely nothing that suggests that will be the outcome. Your conclusion rests on a very fallacious use of history.

It’s like watching people get angry at the first steam engines that appeared.

It is nothing of the sort. Steam engines served mostly useful purposes. AI mostly does not (at least not in an open world environment, it has excellent purposes in closed environments like medicine and science). The fact that it is indeed unstoppable does not make the outrage of its infestation of everything on the internet less, quite contrary.

I genuinely worry about their mental health over the next few years

I guess someone with their head in the sand, their fingers in their ears and screaming at the top of their lungs like you, will have an excellent mental health.

AI is significantly different from the other things you mention. With the others a human is still involved, and in fact indispensible, in the process of creating art.

Not so with AI (except of course for all the human art illegally used to train it). It is also capable of pumping out its creations at a speed no human can match. You search for examples in history of similar things happening, but the fact of the matter is that nothing in human history is equivalent to this. So using history as some sort of guiding light is quite the fool’s errand. We can only judge by what is happening, and the reasons for those things happening, and extrapolate from there.

And judging from those facts then it does become obvious that automated content will very soon drown out all human made creativity, just from the sheer volume of automated content being created at exponentially larger rates.