

Both Lemmy and Piefed support it, though weirdly unlike the alt text field when submitting an image post, this syntax only adds alt text, so only screen readers will see it—users can’t view the text on hover.


Both Lemmy and Piefed support it, though weirdly unlike the alt text field when submitting an image post, this syntax only adds alt text, so only screen readers will see it—users can’t view the text on hover.


I replied to the other user showing how markdown image descriptions work. Titles are added with hashes.
# title
## subtitle
Text
### sub-sub title
Etc.


Image descriptions are a thing in markdown. Images are inserted into markdown documents with this syntax:



I’m afraid I’m not sure what you mean here. Both markdown and LaTeX are plain text. They’re easily read by a screen reader. Though unless the screen reader is specially-designed for LaTeX support, it may be difficult to comprehend. That’s on the screen reader though, not the document format.


Sure. And 90% of those are writing stuff that would be better off as markdown.


Most—certainly not all, but most—documents that are written in Microsoft Word, or in LibreOffice Writer, would be better off as either markdown plain text files, or as LaTeX.
CMV.
Zionists are a subset of antisemites.