While I appreciate calling out predatory and unethical business practices, can someone explain why “Darrow bought the idea for a low price and no royalty rights” is different than “Magie sold for a low price and no royalty rights”?

By all means, if there’s a story about unethical coercion or misleading (that’s the foundation of capitalism after all), I’d like to hear more about it. But if Magie didn’t care enough about the idea and sold it for a quick buck to a capitalist to do with it what they would, I gotta say, I can’t really blame Darrow for buying something they thought had value that Magie didn’t think had value.

Reading Magie’s wikipedia page suggests Darrow ripped it off, despite several patents, and her game, The Landlords Game, being published by another game company, and he sold it to Parker Brothers (who had already published her games before).

Sounds more like Darrow stole the idea and Parker Brothers negligently (or willfully) disregarded patents because they were big enough to get away with it.

It’s this. Stay the fuck down until your row is clearing.