As far as I can tell, there is no official motive known for Crooks, but Robinson was clearly not motivated by right wing propaganda. Where do you get your news? Do you have any sources supporting your theories that they were right wing? The irony…

You don’t think Charlie Kirk or Trump shooting are related to propaganda?

In Minnesota they had a Somalian candidate for mayor who lost because of tribalism within the Somali community. Somalians from different tribes would not vote for him. So then some of the Somali leaders came together and said we are all Somali and should be voting together or we will not take power from the white people. More tribalism.

Leftist is a relative position, so what it means changes depending on what it’s compared to. There is always a left and a right as long as there is a meaningful distinction between the two.

You think leftist propaganda doesn’t exist?

In any event, Kirk was targeted specifically for his views, whereas school shootings are indiscriminate attacks.

Kirk’s killing is inherently more political. School shootings are a slightly different matter. I don’t think Robinson was capable of killing random people. He chose his target. It was an assassination.

Yes, just as there are those on the left who view the killing as deserved or somehow an acceptable outcome.

I read it as him saying that the shooter was unquestionably right wing, which is different than saying that the right wing is desperate to prove that it’s anyone else.

Did you read the article? It’s not quite that simple.

I see, you could actually interpret it either way.

He literally said that the right is “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them”.

He got in trouble for saying that Kirk was killed by his own side.