TRUMP SHOULD BE ARRESTED

  • 41 Posts
  • 464 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2025

help-circle


  • How come when a cis white man does something wrong, people don’t use it to say bad things about all cis white men? How come it’s only when a member of a minority group does something wrong, it’s used to disparage everyone in that group?

    Another example is movies. I listen to movie reviews on YouTube a lot. I don’t know if this is true, but I heard a rumour that the reason Hollywood was afraid to make female superhero movies for a long time was because the Supergirl movie in the 70s sucked. Why doesn’t the same logic apply to male superhero movies? How come when Superman 4 sucked, that didn’t stop Hollywood from making more male superhero movies?








  • Yeah, maybe I was overthinking it a bit and they were saying they want the law against illegal immigration applied to everyone equally but people who have broken additional laws first. I’m very literal minded and thought by “criminal” they meant people who have committed crimes and that illegal entry into the country qualified as a crime. In my mind, they were implying the law should eventually be applied to people who have broken no laws, not even being in the country illegally.

    But regardless of what that individual meant, I think the ultimate goal of Trump’s regime is to criminalize even people who have broken no laws at all


  • I saw a story on Facebook about a Trump supporter who supports the deportations being deported. One of the comments said of course the law should be applied equally to everyone but they should start with criminals first. Hold the phone. Am I misunderstanding or are they admitting that they want the law to be that non-criminals get deported eventually? Apply the law to everyone but criminals first. As if there’s some reason to apply it to non-criminals. Yes, the law applies to everyone, but if someone hasn’t broken the law then applying it to them is irrelevant isn’t it? The law against murder applies to everyone but murderers first. Well, if I’m not a murderer than it’s kind of irrelevant to say the law against murder applies to me. What would applying it to non-murderers even mean? Am I misunderstanding something because of my autism or is that commenter admitting that they want the law to eventually punish people who have done nothing wrong?