Fedegenerate

Ne, mi ankaŭ ne volis lerni esperanton.

I joke, it was fun, esperantists are good people. I did it to ‘cheat’ at being bi-lingual, I don’t think that was the best motivation. Toki pana would’ve been easier.

You haven’t said anything.

You’re movin’ clueless, bro. Nothin’ I’m sayin’ is sinkin’ in, and you ain’t even clocked the situation.

See this? Pointless. Do you have anything beyond “nuh uh”? You’re just yapping: yap yap yap. Say something.

You wanted to talk about non-sequitors, then you didn’t. You wanted to talk about dangerous demographics, then you didn’t. Do you actually want to talk about anything at all? Anything you’re not going to drop the moment it becomes inconvenient? Or are you just going to yap away?

I don’t think you realise what happend to you.

I said the British right argue in bad faith willing to drop positions the moment they become inconvenient. In that comment I told you I was giving you a bunch of bad faith positions to take up.

You valiantly took up a bad faith position to defend.

I made the position inconvenient

You dropped it.

You dont like me, you were at your most guard. and I did that to you, and I did that to you in my downtime at work… And I’m an idiot… What do you think Rupert Murdoch could do to you, read the Epstein files and he’ll tell you.

… and suddenly they don’t want to talk about violent demographics anymore, thanks for demonstrating my point. It’s thought terminating double think all the way down.

If I can puppet you so easily, just think what billionaires can do to you. I swear I was elbow deep at one point, if you find my watch may I have it back? What would you do if was caught lacking Kermit? Prove my point a third time?

I’m sure you believe that. Anyway here’s the data: [https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingseptember2025#offences-involving-firearms].

Anyway, the most violent demographic in this country is men, men killing men all over the land. Regardless of colour or belief or wealth, it’s all men.

What do you want to do to men because they’re so violent. I’ve heard rumblings of deportation, do you want to deport all men, or is deportation not an effective measure for violence?

Or would you like to drop the nonsense and talk about how you’re being robbed blind by the wealthy elite funding your media.

I’m just making fun of the frequent cases of thought terminating double think among the British/global right.

I thought that was obvious, I highlighted the double think in this very thread, then went on to list a bunch more…

It’s a distraction from the Epstein class robbing us blind. We can tell because of the Panama papers, listen to Murdoch/Epstein in the titular files, they’ll tell you themselves. The British right aren’t serious people with a serious point to make, they’ll say what ever, when ever to justify their presupposed position, source: you.

What has Prince Andrew to do with mass immigration? Never read such nonsense, but what else can I expect from leftist 🤷‍♂️

What has immigration to do with one British person stabbing another. Seems even your complaining about non-sequitors is biased. What else can we expect from the right wing except selective outrage.

As you’re engaging in bad faith allow me to: what we should really be worried about is white on white violence. Knife crime in the UK isn’t all that bad, when you remove white gang activity, even more so when you remove men-on-men violence.

All of which to highlight, your position isn’t a serious one genuinely held. You don’t dislike non-sequitors, you engage in them. You disliked their argument, and it is convenient for you to say you don’t like non-sequitors in this moment. You aren’t serious. This culture war nonsense, the British right loves so much, is merely a distraction from the Epstein class robbing us blind.

That’s, that’s really cool. I don’t think I’d reccomend due to me not giving important decisions the actual thought required and that’s led to a very sub-optimal life. I suppose the goal is to train your instincts to make the optimal choice every time, I fail there

I am very ‘in the present’ though, very few anxieties about the future. I do drive as a hobby, which naturally comes with lots of planning. I have fewer regrets about the past; I do hold grudges, famously unforgiving, so I fail there too.

But it wasn’t. The women drunkenly singing down the phone was also funny, also played for laughs. Your premise is false.

I said ‘women’, that was who it was aimed at. As at the time, women were picked up by men traditionally. But, there were a few drunken women singing down the phone at some hot stud.

When people talk about punching Nazis in the face, they are talking (mostly) about people who were not even alive in the 1940s, let alone official members of the Nazi Party.

That’s correct. That’s because they’ve learned the lessons of history.

You’re the one connecting the celebration of bombing and “murdering” (I guess you think acts of war and judicial executions are murder) Nazis in the past to punching Nazis now.

You’re the one who said ‘Nazi’. You could have said ‘racist’, you could have said bigot, you chose your word. You made that connection by choosing the words you did.

I think it wasn’t OK to stab this victim even if he called the other guy a slur for Pakistanis.

We agree, don’t stab the guy to death. What’s that got to do with punching Nazis? Do you think the victim was punched? Do you think the victim was a nazi?

But others advocate extrajudicial acts of violence against “Nazis” where it’s their rules and perceptions that determine who is a Nazi and who is not.

History, lessons. The people that visited violence against Nazis are heros or villains? Why is ‘Nazi’ in quotes now?

Bombing Birmingham because it might have some people with Nazi-adjacent political opinions seemed like a logical extension of your train of thought.

Only if you believe Birmingham is full of Nazis. Else, you got some weird logic.

You were mocking me for thinking punching Nazis is wrong because it was celebrated to kill actual Nazis during war and for crimes against humanity 80 years ago. So let’s resume the bombings then.

Correct, I was, I am. History tells us Nazis are good or bad? History tells us appeasing Nazis works or doesn’t? What does work against Nazis? The lessons are there, easy to learn. Bomb whom, where are you declaring there to be Nazis? Is bombing punching? I said punching is mild compared to what we used to do, that’s all I said. Why is the internet all gas no brakes all the time?

Noted. You think Hampshire is full of Nazis? Why do you think Hampshire is full of Nazis?

How do you get from, history celebrates those that killed Nazis and that’s bad, to bombing Hampshire?

I can hear your silent rage as we honour all those Nazi killers in the past. Why are you bringing up the 40’s anyway?

Is it ok to kill Nazis? Shoot them, bomb them, gas them, firebomb them? History tells us it’s so, certainly mistakes were made, but we consider it a net good. But merely punching them? That’s beyond the pale.

What? Not everyone listens to the radio. Of those that listen to the radio not everyone listens to that station. Of those that listen to the radio, and listen to that station, not everyone listens to the same shows. Of those that listen to the radio, listen to that station, listen to that program, you need a guy to think “I better write that number down”. We’re talking a segment of a segment. I think it was national radio though, so there was plenty of coverage.

Some people did hear the number and some didn’t, the people that did gave the number to the people that didn’t . It’s easy to see how it would work.

Aside from the voicemails were some testimonials, either about trying to give a miss call immediately. Or, more awkwardly, the guy had already saved the number from the radio show (as the radio fake line), in a surprising amount of self awareness. So it didn’t always work, just enough to fill a segment every now and then. It was just a satire of pick up culture in the mid oughts… Between the 3310 and the iPhone anyway

There was radio station that had a number for women to give out, and they’d play the voicemails on air.

That’s why I barely think at all. If I won’t remember the decision next week, I don’t care at all.

Drives my fiancée nuts, she’s agonising about which takeaway to go to, but can’t ask me because I’ll just say the first one she names. I got 7 years out of that before she noticed though: should we A, or B? We should A. Did you just say A because I listed it first?

My problem is that I can’t identify what I’ll remember next week/month/year. So I knee jerk life changing decision, which mortgage provider? A sounds good.

TIL, I thought they were symbolic and typically blunt, goes to show how good my RE was, or how little attention I paid. Not that it matters, this one was sharp enough to stab someone to death. Thanks for showing me something I was wrong about.

My wiki research suggests it used to be a sword before the British, it would be ironic if it used to be a dagger before the British…

A-C-A… What’s the point anymore? Also:

It has also prompted the Conservatives and Reform UK to say the UK should not have “two-tier policing,” with people treated differently because of the colour of their skin

The fucking cheek, there’s real evidence for this being the case and I’m pretty sure reform/conservatives will like what that evidence says. Anyways I’ll just leave this here

Wife approved comment.

The 10 cm wound perforating his rectum is the second biggest asshole, after the bull fighter himself.