Sorry, just the 34th rule of the Internet

Slap some fins on and it’ll make drone delivery (of beer) more accurate at least.

That’s not how that works at all.

You: People should be judged based on actual evidence of their actions, not by mere reputation and should be presumed innocent until proven otherwise.

Also you:

Ew .ml

It looks like you’re hypocritically engaging in the exact kind of prejudice that you were just arguing against.

The need for evidence and presumption of innocence are not simply legal fictions that only apply inside of a courtroom.

Can you think of an answer to your question would justify the removal of due process or need for proof beyond a reasonable doubt?

The legal system errs on the side of letting some guilty people go free in order to try to protect against innocent people being unfairly punished.

That’s why the standard for criminal conviction is that the accused is innocent if you have any reasonable doubt.

I’m not sure how you square that definition with what the OP wrote in the headline.

They said that we wouldn’t need the Epstein files (the evidence collected by the FBI in order to prosecute this child sex trafficking ring) to prove DJT’s guilt if we just believed women.

I hope you can, at least, see how that appears to be saying that “the evidence isn’t needed if we believe women.” and not “we should take womens claims seriously.”

You’re right that there are two vastly different interpretations of that statement: (1). Take women seriously and (2). A woman’s accusation is a higher form of evidence.

OP’s headline is, at best, poorly written but it’s very easy to understand why it appears to be using (2).

You have no idea what you’re talking about.

This is pretty ironic.

Witness testimony in court is not “just an accusation”. It’s corroborated by cross examination.

Cross examination is where the opposing council questions the witness in an attempt to poke holes in their testimony, point out inconsistencies and otherwise discredit the witness.

While corroboration means:

To strengthen or support with other evidence; make more certain. synonym: confirm.

Cross examination, be definition, is the exact opposite of corroboration.

Diffusion models make images. LLMs are language models and do not make images.

It’s weird and disheartening to see someone on social media who has a strong opinion about a topic that they know nothing about.

OP, you really stirred up the Luddites today