BeelzebubEiNukuKoskaan

There would have to be so many exceptions, that its just easier to make separate deals.

Like, take just cars, trucks and trucking, the EU and Canada regulations, requirements and laws are different enough that Canada would have to do some major changes with those alone and it would cost a whole bunch of moneys. Or they’d have to make an exception rule for that.

Stuff like weight, lengths, headlights, headlight heights, truck driver work limits, vehicle/equipment certification process etc would need to be changed. Or given exceptions.

One of those cases where a old law was never over turned.

russia at its peak was comparable to Italy by their GDP, militarily they have always had a lot of equipment and men but they were never anything more than a regional power.

Yeah, times are changing and russia has been making all the wrong decisions.

Ukraine is indeed doing well. But russia is not a superpower, never was. There was a time when the Soviet Union was a superpower, for a while. But that was in the 1960s, maybe a bit in the 1970s.

The amount of money they’d receive from selling drones to some rebels would be tiny compared to the reputational loss and diplomatic issues they’d have if they did it. A country that is fighting for its survival cant afford to have international diplomacy problems just to get some tens or hundreds of thousands of drone selling money. Especially when you consider that a lot of their foreign fighters are from Colombia and they have considerable support from Colombians.

Your hunches are, sorry to be so blunt, completely moronic and quite ignorant.

Right… so how would Ukraine benefit from supplying groups fighting against Colombia?

Why would Ukraine supply them with drones? What on earth would they benefit from doing that?

They should make them flow downhill, that would save fuel

“Climate change has made the Panama Canal unusable, should we do anything about it?”

“Yes, lets build a new canal, with blackjack and hookers!”