So long as it is actually a peaceful protest, I see no issue with them speaking their mind. You can disagree with someone’s politics, but it should not enable you to condemn their ability to express themselves. If however them protesting becomes violent, then I could agree with such a ban, but there would have to be a lenient definition on violent since otherwise it becomes easily susceptible to false flags.

I’m not the least bit surprised considering I didn’t know this event existed until articles started popping up.

Legally speaking it doesn’t, but it does grant him many more ways to use executive powers which he could definetly levy to accumulate enough power to remove term limits from the equation.

If there is any doubt, shoot first then find out who gets mad. I would hazard a guess that a. Drone enthusiasts are smart enough to fly their drones away from the border, and b. Shooting and then paying to replace a drone would be a cheap expenditure for national security.

I’m not sure we should be looking to them for pointers, but it could be as easy as sha256 public and private keys, that’s already much better