• passepartout@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Sorry for being nitpicky and thanks for naming them all. I just assume the term average is equivalent to mean average in peoples heads. For uneven distributions, like wealth or life expectancy are I assume, mean average in itself just wouldn’t be a useful measurement.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes, when most people say average, they mean mean. Few people I’ve met know the other concepts even exist.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Even Excel has a function called “average”, whereas R uses the “mean” function for the same thing. Interestingly, R doesn’t have a function called “average”, because that term is far too ambiguous to statisticians. I think that summarizes pretty well who these tools were made for.

      • poke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        US public schools taught me that mean=average and the others were themselves, not that average describes any process to find a “normal” value. Just throwing that out there so people know why the conversation above happens so frequently.

      • TauZero@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        The very wiki article quoted says average to mean mean (made explicit later). OP showerthought was calculating life expectancy in a way different than commonly understood. The first nitpick was correct.