• canofcam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I think YOU are missing the point of the first comment and MY point.

        They said that they are infuriated by people name-calling them, somebody said “see how you like it” and… I wasn’t infuriated.

        Insane that anti-vegan people (who have generally fallen for right-wing propaganda) are so bandwagony that you are getting upvoted for being so very incorrect.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yep, if namecalling is what prevents someone from going vegan…no it isn’t. It is just an excuse and they were going to continue eating meat with or without the namecalling.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No. They’re not. They made an example to set you up, and you walked right into it. Making their point for them.

          Talking shit about someone’s diet isn’t going to make them change their diet.

          The only insane part is that you view everyone that isn’t a vegan as “anti-vegan”. Or that everyone that disagrees with you is “anti-vegan”

          I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money.

          • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I don’t think the cashier at my local grocery store is “anti-boardgames” just because they feel annoyed when someone tries to pay with monopoly money.

            While I agree that there is a difference between non-vegan and anti-vegan, this is a very strained analogy.

        • BreadOven@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Nah, op is correct. Also no one mentioned right-wing stuff…or politics at all. Why would you bring that up and imply op is right-wing?

          • canofcam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            not implying they are right wing at all, that wasn’t my intention. Try re-reading it.

            Nah, op is correct.

            So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated? Is that not what I was originally replying to? Is that not why I said I was unbothered by namecalling, to point out the fact that it is not infuriating?

            • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              So the first comment in this thread did not say they were infuriated?

              Nope.

              They said:

              it just infuriates people

              They said “people”, not “I”. They didn’t say “I am infuriated”.

              The only information we have about the state of the person you are replying to is that they’re hungry.