• Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Very common in Ireland. The main contribution of the RSA (Road Safety Authority) over the past few years seems to be handing out high-vis elements to pedestrians and cyclists. The media is antropomorphising cars instead of blaming drivers, to the extent that statistics on the causes of crashes aren’t being collected.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I mean, making sure drivers can see you seems like a very sensible thing to do. I’ve come across pedestrians on unlit roads, and any sort of high visibility clothing or a light makes them visible from multiple times the distance.

        There’s a reason cyclists are required to have lights outside of daylight hours where I live.

        • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I’m currently vacationing in a country where pedestrians are required to wear reflexive elements when it’s dark, and I really like that. However, putying all onus on pedestrians while not even analyzing the causes of crashes (including hit pedestrians and cyclists), which would lead to improved road infrastructure, signage and enforcement, will lead to more deaths. As long as you’re allowed to drive 80 km/h on a winding road where two cars can’t even pass each other, no amount of lights or reflective vests will save the pedestrians.