• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Call me old, but I don’t think that under 16s should be allowed on a dating site even without an social media ban.

    • Master167@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree.

      Should a government be forcing this? I don’t think so. Especially if that requires providing personal information to the internet to enforce compliance.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Who but the government would enforce the law? Because if there is none, there is no reason for the dating app to self-limit their customer base. They might write “you have to be 18+ to use this app” in the T&Cs, but nobody could held them responsible if school kids hang out there with fictional birthdays.

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      So far, I thought this was the norm. Dating apps are basically all 18+ here, although I did encounter kids posing as adults while I still used them

    • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m confused. Teens officially on a dating site??? Like, without needing to lie about their age??? First time hearing about this.

  • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is lemmy not on the list?!??? WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? We are so gonna be flooded with teens…

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good. The vast majority of social media is corporate cancer and kids should have a chance to develop critical thinking skills before they start using it.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        People seem to forget that a great multitude of information sources existed prior to social media - even on the Internet.

  • Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The pieces of software the article mentions are:

    Meta – Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp
    
    Snap
    
    Tiktok
    
    YouTube
    
    X
    
    Roblox
    
    Pinterest
    
    Discord
    
    Lego Play
    
    Reddit
    
    Kick
    
    GitHub
    
    HubApp
    
    Match
    
    Steam
    
    Twitch
    

    Sketchy ID verification aside, I agree with everything except for GitHub and YouTube.

    YouTube is such a resource for DIY and learning, you just can’t ban kids from it, even if parts of it are sketchy. A restricted mode for kids would be better.

    GitHub is also a huge database of knowledge, important for being techy and computer literate, and doesn’t really even have much on the way of social features. Banning this would be asinine.

    I was initially against Steam, but then I realized that parents could still buy their kids games, and it’s probably better to force parents to take responsibility for that anyways.

  • brown567@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, probably best to keep <16yos off dating apps…

    The rest of it, yeah. I heard Github is also possibly on the list? XD

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      btw you know she worked as a “government relations manager” for twitter, adobe and microshit before landing this job