• Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    To be fair: what else? Spend billions to become a European competitor to nvidia first and THEN build this "super"computer?

    Not that this wouldn’t be way better, but it’s just not gonna happen soon.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I just found the irony remarkable.

      We have all the technology in Europe. We know how to make the chips AND the chip factories etc. Just nobody wants to do it here, so we deliver the tech to elsewhere.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Guess the problem is that we might have chips and tech, but not on a level ndidia can currently deliver. AND in the needed quantity and time. Not to mention the best available speed. Which, for this project, is crucial. With 42k chips, only a slight disadvantage in speed adds up massively.

        But dont get me wrong. Yeah sure we SHOULD. I can just understand why we can’t. Right now. Yet celebrating it as “european” is a bit…weird.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If EU want to become relevant in future industry then it’ll have to do decades of catching up, yes.

      One way to kickstart it is to have military only procure EU produced chips. It’ll be redonkulously expensive, but it’s also a necessity for domestic security.

      This announcement is like putting lipstick on a pig, instead.