No i meant you can’t post intelligent thought or, like, a 40tb single piece .rar archive. You literally can’t.
But i wasn’t talking about what you were allowed to say, sorry; I thought I’d already clarified this. Why do you want to argue about something totally tangential and pointless on which i expressed no opinion? What are you getting out of this?
But if the work wasnt necessary, this is a resource allocation and cruelty issue.
Who gets to decide what’s ‘necessary?’
There are a lot of answers to that, snd i cannot think of a worse one than what we have right now.
But my favorite: the people doing and supporting it.
If you can’t think of a worse system, you should probably read more history books.
So you just like this one and wanted to pretend there are no alternatives. Got it. Very intellectually honest. Carry on; i won’t interrupt.
Carry on; i won’t interrupt.
Of course you won’t. We’re on the internet, and I can post anything I want.
That’s another thing you should read up on.
I meant your meticulously maintained ignorance, dear. Sorry, i was assuming you had interiority and weren’t a philosophical zombie.
You definitely cannot, and much of what you could would be banned.
What you want to post is likely to be banned.
I, on the other hand, can make my point without resorting to name calling and vulgarity.
You should try it, even if it leaves you with very little to say.
No i meant you can’t post intelligent thought or, like, a 40tb single piece .rar archive. You literally can’t.
But i wasn’t talking about what you were allowed to say, sorry; I thought I’d already clarified this. Why do you want to argue about something totally tangential and pointless on which i expressed no opinion? What are you getting out of this?