• Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      We are decentralized, according to FediDB, the Fediverse has 14.2 million accounts. Lemmy+Piefed+Mbin have 551k users. Obviously we could be better spread out, but the fact that there’s no instance at 50% share is already pretty nice.

      And if a big instance enshittified, it would be drastically easier for everyone to leave it compared to convincing people to leave Reddit or something. You just export/import your user settings and you get to keep the communities you’ve subscribed to and block, and the users you’ve blocked.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No. The idea is to have the constant looming threat of decentralization to keep the centralized system in check.

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Except in this there’s really not a lot of benefit when it comes to centralization so it would be better to decentralize to make sure no single instance becomes too big. I’d say world is already a bit too big because 90% of my subscribed feeds would be gone if world no longer federated with Piefed. World has significant sway on our side of the fediverse because smaller instances will probably feel dead (or turn into an echo chamber) if world won’t federate with them.

    • Magitian@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Precisely! What’s the point of an overpopulated instance? It’s more likely to affect users because of blanket instance blocklists.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          ML was run by the Lemmy frontend maintainers who drain the blood of puppies for sustenance and wish to kill you slowly and painfully as a source of income.

        • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          .ml has a lot of pro-Russia, pro-China types and criticism of either country can lead to a quick ban.

          Functionally, there is no difference. Both run the same software, tho the versions may slightly differ as the devs, who run .ml, push updates.

          For a functionally different experience try Mbin/Kbin (I forget which is the current), or Piefed. Piefed is similar to Lemmy with some quality of life improvements. Kbin/Mbin is a cross between “tweet” style posts, “blog” style posts like tumblr, and Reddit type posts.

        • Ripley_Tripley@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          From my experience, people in .world are way more open to positive discussion than .ml. Everything upsets .ml if you say the wrong thing or dont post the right way, to make them understand. Its to much fucking drama for no reason.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Decentralized networks with large centralized communities is the best approach. You have to have that number of people to have interesting conversations and engagement.

          But if all the users are spread out across several instances it becomes more resilient. If a large community/instance goes offline or there’s a controversy then it can be migrated to a new instance

        • Semperverus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s good to have it as an option but most people are frustrated if they can’t just go to one place that has tons of people.