• Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not arguing to exclude animal agriculture from laws about animal abuse. Here’s what I’m saying:

    • Making the law very strict in a way that would make animal agriculture impossible, or its products too expensive, would be politically impossible. People would oppose such changes.
    • But if you make a special case where cruelty just for the sake of cruelty, for entertainment, would be severly punished, I think that would be very much acceptable. I don’t imagine that people would oppose that. And that’s a win we can take.
    • The bar for “animal abuse” remains unfortunately low for most industries, but we take every win we can get.
    • That doesn’t prevent us from continuing to educate people about the realties of human agriculture, and to make people think about their impact on sentient beings’ wellbeing and suffering.

    And I don’t consume animal products.