• NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does living under deplorable conditions and being killed in a painful way sound better if we say it is for “enjoyment” rather than “entertainment”? 🤔

    • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I didn’t say it sounds better. I’m just suggesting an update of the law in a way that would strongly punish cruelty for entertainment while staying politically acceptable.

      • lookingforanALFpolycule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’m trying to understand your reasoning for this. There is billions of animals tortured to death in slaughter houses but you want to change the laws for these few monkeys why?

        Because if you believe that every saved animal is worth fighting for then why are you not living in line with those morals when it comes to your food choices?