• Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The problem with blockchain is that everything you can do with it can also be done with a good database. In the case of crypto, it also means that you have to download THE ENTIRE THING SINCE IT STARTED if you want to run a full node capable of validating transactions. The Bitcoin Blockchain was - as of September 2025 - 674GB in size, adding a gigabyte every few days, meaning it is probably around 750GB today, stored on every single full node - what a waste of space. Databases are a lot more flexible in that regard.

    • musicalphysics@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      And a centralized database can be modified at will by whoever controls it. Just because you place no value on a distributed ledger that is censorship and fraud resistant doesn’t mean that configuration has no value. Centralized currencies are secured with violence. Blockchains are secured with math.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        You can also apply cryptographic functions to make sure database entries are not modified - this is then an issue of transparency and not centralization.

        • musicalphysics@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Centralized powers can do whatever they want with the database. You are welcome to transparently watch them do whatever they want without recourse.