The representatives, the strategists, the marketing campaign…

On some fronts I am sure it would have a competitive edge over human parties. The question is who the owner would be.

    • B1tch_Pudding@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Years ago we used to hypothesize that an ai governance was the only way to be equitable to everyone. Now it just turns out it does the same thing as any market-worshipping crackhead.

      Guess that’s fortunate for the mush brained lardball who’s using prompts to write policy though

      • Skipcast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s because it’s not “real” ai as depicted in fiction, just a very expensive imitation that sometimes kinda works

        • B1tch_Pudding@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Eh, neural networks as they exist now are close enough it’s safe to assume. Our brains work pretty similarly with clusters of information and calling on them selectively based on their assigned value.

          I go as far as to classify a person using an ai tool as part of its neural network, if they’re making decisions and affecting the world as a result of using the tool.