It’s actually a good idea to do something more distinctive than just your name in cursive
While i don’t nexessarily disagree with that, just signing your full name in cursive may actually be better than something overimplified. The longer it is, the easier to interpret the handwriting (and harder to fake).
I’d wager that going into something gimmicky like including heart or a bird in your signature would only make it less foolproof. When, say, a bank teller checks their clients’ signature against the one on file, they’re more likely to focus more on the gimmick and less on the habdwriting. And if you shorten your signature as well, that’s an even larger issue.
The same problem applies even if you report something and an analyst is called. You just made the analyst’s job harder and the imposter’s job easier.
While i don’t nexessarily disagree with that, just signing your full name in cursive may actually be better than something overimplified. The longer it is, the easier to interpret the handwriting (and harder to fake).
I’d wager that going into something gimmicky like including heart or a bird in your signature would only make it less foolproof. When, say, a bank teller checks their clients’ signature against the one on file, they’re more likely to focus more on the gimmick and less on the habdwriting. And if you shorten your signature as well, that’s an even larger issue.
The same problem applies even if you report something and an analyst is called. You just made the analyst’s job harder and the imposter’s job easier.