• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    would it be better if the population was growing past 9bn?

    There’s a stable population the ecosystem can support and I’m pretty sure 9bn is too fuckin many.

    not that I’m volunteering to free up space tho… there’s a whole lot of techbro chuds who think there’s way too many people, but their motivations are pretty genocidal tbh.

    honestly we’re fucked in either direction, but I suspect there’s a lot of reasons the population total will go down once the climate crisis starts shifting millions of people around.

    • weps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      yes growth would be better for me so there are more young people to support the old people

      I don’t have enough to give so much to old people

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        more young people to support the old people

        But human labor is incredibly efficienct in the modern day. You don’t need ten young people for every one old person - nine of whom die by their mid-30s - so that everyone doesn’t starve.

        But the role of elderly people has changed so much in the last century. On a national scale, they’re no longer master craftsmen or child caregivers or elder advisors. They’re just the base of the consumer economy and the electoral pool.

        As democracy fails and the economy becomes more fixated on tech capital than quality of life, they’re marked out as increasingly expendable.

        It isn’t that we need more young people so much as we’ve alienated and de-skilled our old people.