• bryophile@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    After all this time humanity finally created a world with high life expectancy, just to start wondering now whether we should.

      • bryophile@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        True, but that’s not the case yet. Old people generally need healthcare and other services (provided by young people).

        And they don’t provide anything in return from their care homes. Honestly, it’s best to just send them off on an ice floe.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          It would be better to keep them integrated in communities so they can serve as elders- providing advice, supporting children and parents, and spreading their community’s history.

          The care homes are the problem, not the need for care.

          • bryophile@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            True, that would be even better but sounds like communism so it won’t happen. I would certainly prefer it over the ice floe thing

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      After all this time humanity finally created a world with high life expectancy…

      …and it only cost the sustainability of the lower class and the entire global south.

      • bryophile@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Of course I agree people dying is horrible, but there need to be enough people to take care of the elderly and to keep society running. Best hope for care robots I guess, although that seems dystopian too.