• Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    “That’s an Altec Lansing speaker from…”

    “No you fucking idiot, look at the fucking picture”

    “An astute observation! I completely overlooked the product label on the picture! Hers the correct information. The picture shows an ACTON speaker built in…”

    “No you fucking idiot, it clearly says ACTRON”

    “Let’s start over, this time discarding my previous suggestions…”

    A literal conversation I had with the Google version of AI while thrifting speakers

    • plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      My favorite is when I search for how to do something in Blender (the 3d modeling and animation program) only realize that I’m wasting my time reading a slop article on what is ostensibly a cooking website because someone told their AI to write a bunch of articles on how to use a blender (the kitchen appliance) and couldn’t be bothered to so much as read the titles before publishing them.

    • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve taken to avoiding anything made after AI and searching for before:2023 to get away from the worst garbage.

      Mind you, the web has been nearly unusable since 2018ish, so I tend to go for even older products. Feels like witnessing the fall of Rome, having to go to these lengths just to find basic info.

  • Bonsoir@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    And then, the inevitable “what I like to do in this situation”…
    No. You don’t “like” doing anything, you don’t actually “do” anything and you’ve never been “in a situation” before.

    • Robert7301201@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      This is something that really infuriates me. You are a machine. You do not have personal preferences. That is reserved for persons.

      I’m pretty sure the change was deliberate, because I didn’t notice the behavior until several months ago. Now it’s prolific. People like anecdotes, so it probably performs better subjectively.

  • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Burning compute for no reason… I agree.

    But lucky me, in my case it actually figured out what kind of imperial nonsense threaded bolt I needed for my CLC’s rad after I gave it a thread count. (Btw. it is a 6#-32 bolt)

    • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I asked it the size of the axel nut on my car. It was off my 4mm. I asked it again, it confidently gave me the wrong answer again.

      I reached l realized it thought I meant the REAR axel nut, which is in fact 4mm smaller. So I specifically stated FRONT nut, and it still got it wrong.

      AI is useful for lots of things, just always always always fact check it.

      But yeah… Real search is going away, replaced by forced AI garbage that cannot correctly tell me the nut size.

      • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, I measured the bolt I had and gave it the outer diameter in mm and the thread per mm. Just asking it blind would have given me all sorts of guesses.