• walden@wetshav.ing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Meme aside, is this based on inflation? Some sort of global market?

    If it’s inflation it’s not accurate. 100 2026 dollars is equivalent to 70 2013 dollars (not $50).

    Just trying to fact check the math. I’m fun at parties.

    • majster@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Your personal purchasing power could be very different than the CPI. Also I think people put more importance on the basics like food and housing, those are surely 100% more expensive than 13 years ago. And with that going up you don’t really care that you can afford more t-shirts. But t-shirts are bringing down the CPI.

      So yeah: lies, damn lies and statistics. P.S. also fun at parties

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Surely there is a standardized economic metric for consumer purchasing power strictly for necessities as well. I assume this, because economists throw the best parties.

      • crimson_iris@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Meme aside, is this based on shaking a cow? Some sort of bovine agitator?

        If it’s shaking a cow it’s not accurate. Shaking a cow produces only 120ml of foamy milk (not 750ml).

        Just trying to fact check the math. I’m fun at parties.

    • SystemDisc@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I think if you include cost of living and cost of purchasing property, the US dollar is easily 50% less effective now than in 2013.