• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    So is your position that stuff like what is described by OOP is a necessary and worthwhile tradeoff for the smooth operation of a school? Or maybe that it isn’t a bad thing at all?

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I think it can be phrased better. But the core policy is perfectly fine. Often you can’t spend class time arguing with every student about every absence. Instead, you tell them, “sorry, it’s your responsibility to be here on time. I realize accidents happen, that’s why you get a certain number of free tardies, so the accidents don’t hurt you.”

      It’s a perfectly fine way to run a classroom. You don’t try and figure out whether the student is truly responsible for a small number of absences. Give them three free tardies. When shit happens, they’re covered. But it saves your from having to argue with 16 year olds about every single absence and tardy. If a student goals over the limit, then you can actually put in the time to see if their excuses are valid.

      Smooth operation of a school is not some minor thing to be dismissed. Every minute in class spent arguing about absence excuses is a minute taken from the instruction of every other student in the class.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Smooth operation of a school is not some minor thing to be dismissed

        That’s fair, but the benefits of bureaucracy do not negate the ways that it is dehumanizing, even if they happen to outweigh them. The inability of individual bureaucrats to do anything about it also doesn’t negate that.