I really don’t see any way in which you’ve at all challenged me. Implying I’m stupid isn’t really a challenge so much as projecting how weak your argument is that you have to stoop to ad hominem.
Which is funny because I actually agree with your main point, but it’s far, far from the only factor, nor does the blame lie where you’re trying to place it.
So that’s a solid “no” on presenting whatever you think you have that contradicts the assertion that bipartisan neoliberalism created the conditions which allowed Trump to become a viable candidate?
I’m sorry, what? What on earth have you given me to refute? An assertion? You feel free to provide some ‘evidence’ and daddy will come back and refute it for you, okay bud?
I really don’t see any way in which you’ve at all challenged me. Implying I’m stupid isn’t really a challenge so much as projecting how weak your argument is that you have to stoop to ad hominem. Which is funny because I actually agree with your main point, but it’s far, far from the only factor, nor does the blame lie where you’re trying to place it.
So that’s a solid “no” on presenting whatever you think you have that contradicts the assertion that bipartisan neoliberalism created the conditions which allowed Trump to become a viable candidate?
I’m sorry, what? What on earth have you given me to refute? An assertion? You feel free to provide some ‘evidence’ and daddy will come back and refute it for you, okay bud?