• northendtrooper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    The general did not specify the type of Russian aircraft involved or disclose the location, date, or circumstances of the aerial engagement.

    This makes the article a nothing burgher. There is a vast difference between a Mig23ML and a Su-27.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The story is that the F16s are up and effective. This is more about the planes, crews, and logistics working rather than a Top Gun plot.

    • silver@das-eck.haus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      It says it may have been a su-35 that was confirmed down recently. That would be a solid victory

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This could honestly mean anything whether it’s a MiG 23, a Su-27, and Su-35, or an Su-47. Those span literally every tier from “eh” to “holy shit no way!” The fact that they didn’t disclose the downed model makes me assume the former.