• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Ok, maybe I should have said single trips. Multi year expeditions involved many stops, a trip to Mars would be non stop.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      That is a fair point. There are still examples of multi-year expeditions without any stops for resupply, such as antarctic expeditions of the early 1900’s, but they are a lot fewer; and many of those didn’t turn out too great.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I suppose early antartic expeditions would be a decent comparison point, an exceedingly dangerous and long journey when people already know they almost certainly won’t find anything ‘nice’ there. I suppose we know more about Mars now than they did in the antarctic expeditions knew in advance, but I think they had the general idea of what they could possibly find as being grim enough to be doubtful of it being worth it.