• testaccount372920@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Blowing up a low orbit satellites can lead to many particles reaching high altitudes, if only temporary as you say, where they can cause cascades. Unstable orbits make the probability of collisions smaller, but they need to shatter only one satellite to end up with a mess in stable orbits.

    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Space is pretty big. I understand the odds are non zero but it’s still really small in this scenario.

      • nullify3112@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        There’s a whole concept about this, a Kessler countdown of some sort. Some scientists are trying to figure out in the hypothetical situation where all satellites in orbit lost attitude control and evasive maneuver capabilities, how long would it take to initiate the Kessler syndrome. Apparently we went from months to days within the last decade.

        An astrophysicist I follow on Matodon is super vocal about it. I’ll have to find her posts.

      • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it will depend on how they would disable the satellites. There’s a lot of Starlink satellites, it’s a lot of particles if they use explosives…