• Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    Its getting harder to believe that if we could do this to the Thiel’s of the world this rhetoric wouldn’t disappear.

      • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Does it? If a loudspeaker is pushing a madness through its coils that drives animals mad is the solution to change the structure of animal behavior or turn the loudspeaker off so it can never make animals fall to madness again?

        • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          look i aint no cowbee and i just woke up, revolution means a lot of things, and it isnt a one and done deal. your analogy kinda masks what youre trying to say so i don’t really know where to start.

          there are much smarter people than me that have written a greater amount then i ever could, go read their stuff.

          edit: oh and to answer your question, yes, revolution means more than just killing the enemy.

          • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            And all I said was this rhetoric, I didnt actually believe my big hand squish hypothetical was a real revolution, just that if you could magically do this problems would vanish overnight, not all but surprising ones for sure. Though in 2026, simply murdering billionaires with no other plan is revolutionary.