• Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    My favorite example is the QWERTY keyboard being based on typewriters. Just something whimsical about how no matter how much technology advances we will still be using our cyber-typewriters.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well also it’s just a good way of organizing keys for the english language at least, while it may have meant more for type writers where mistakes were permanent it’s still good for keeping pace with modern computers and phones.

      • cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Qwerty was introduced to slow down typing speed so that skilled typists wouldn’t damage the typewriters.

        I don’t think you can argue it’s good design for keeping pace with computers and phones when it literally slows people down compared to layouts like Dvorak.

        • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          This! It was made specifically to limit functionality to match mechanical constraints. Nothing about QWERTY is inherently ‘good’ for English.

          Additionally QWERTZ and AZERTY were adapted from QWERTY to perform the same role for other languages - to reduce jamming by slowing down common letter combinations or separating their input across two hands