• b34k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    We (USA) gave up on being clean energy leaders decades ago and now China has emerged in our place.

    Now, between meddling in our universities, research granting system, and an insane HHS Secretary, we’re headed on the same path in a larger number of other science and technical fields, especially Medicine.

      • b34k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The article mentioned solar tech being first patented in the US, and even as recently as the 70s the government injected cash to push it forward.

        So maybe not “Clean energy leader” per se, but certainly tech leader in the clean energy space.

        • optissima@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          A tech leader 55 years ago isnt a tech leader anymore. I donated a dollar to a solar development program, which is a larger percentage of my wealth than the US put forward of its. Am I a tech leader now too?

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The correct wording would be to give up on becoming, giving up on being indicates that they were at the point they gave up.

    • rayyy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also, we (USA) gave up on being the world leader in 2025 and now China has emerged in our place.