The second part is describing a social contract of sorts, conditional assistance , which would put it squarely on the side of “expecting it to be reciprocal”, situationally at least.
I don’t disagree with this, but it’s a really big difference from your original reply.
as i said, nuance.
The second part is describing a social contract of sorts, conditional assistance , which would put it squarely on the side of “expecting it to be reciprocal”, situationally at least.
I don’t disagree with this, but it’s a really big difference from your original reply.
That’s because I’m a different person that is expanding on your nuance, not the person you originally replied to (TropicalDingdong). 😁
Well, shit…that would explain it, my bad.
No offense taken. It was obviously a misunderstanding.