A long-running energy crisis in the island nation reached a breaking point this week, when government officials said they had run out of reserves.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Again, the idea isn’t necessarily to make Russia lose. It’s to make them fight for a long time.

    • panthera_@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The problem is the difficulty in determining how long Ukraine can hold out. If Russia conquers Ukraine, it will be much more powerful. Of course, Putin knows this. That’s the reason he’s fighting.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m not suggesting that this is a good strategy, or that Russia doesn’t have their own strategy. I predict that if we see Russia begin to convincingly turn the tide (perhaps it has begun) we’ll see renewed aid to Ukraine-- maybe newer fighter planes. In general though, it doesn’t seem like Ukraine could really “win” on the terms they would like. Ultimately, as you mentioned, attrition favors Russia. You need soldiers to hold territory.