nor able to sweep up brick dust on the floor for decades because it is “destined” to be reverse-bullet damage that is fixed in the future.

(In the movie, you see them walk into a pre-damaged room that is later ‘repaired’ by the inverted gunfire that caused it)

  • Naich@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Yes, in a nutshell. Tenet looks lovely, but the time consistency is appalling. The physics is also broken, and the whole thing just becomes a mess if you start thinking about it. There are very few consistent time travel films. Back to the Future is good, and the TV series Dark handles it brilliantly.

    • breezeblock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s because time travel is not (meaningfully) possible. If you want time travel fun, to have to accept broken physics.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Also consistent - and all very different from both Tenet, and each other:

      Primer (2004) - American low-budget sci-fi darling that didn’t dumb itself down

      Summer Time Machine Blues (2005) - Japanese comedy about a missing air conditioner remote

      Timecrimes (2007) - Spanish mystery-thriller with twists