• Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If it’s Linux, presumably, it will be open source. Meaning, presumably, any anti-privacy code will be easily identified.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      well, only if every employee has to compile his own desktop, otherwise I don’t see how you could be sure the published code is the one you have on your desktop

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Oh, mate, come on… If it’s for employees, privacy is irrelevant. If they do this in any semi-competent way, they will want proper management tools to come with the OS - a way to monitor and protect (from “both ends”) included.

        By “both ends” I mean data extraction both by a malicious party outside and inside the government. It’s bog standard enterprise approach to have what’s called “DLP”, or “Data Loss Prevention”, policies (and software solutions) in place.

    • Pman@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      While that is true if it is for the masses in france who there would go out of their way to find the work around and implement it after switching from windows or Mac?

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Well, it’s not “for the masses”, it’s “for the government”, right? My assumption is that if there are good solutions or upgrades implemented in the OS, the OSS community will be able to extract the good bits without also pulling the “bad” bits.