• moonshadow@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Maybe it’s all the drugs (did more than enough, long ago) but I’m genuinely unsure what you’re trying to say. It doesn’t take a lot of institutional support to get high and listen to music, I get a vague sense you think I’m supporting something and find that hypocritical. Care to elaborate?

    • amne@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      No, i’m just saying that you’re executing the cycle op is talked about either way. Up to you to do what you want with that.

        • amne@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          That’s for you to answer for yourself.

          The original statement is a framework, or a formula like a+b=c. You define what kind of life is “worthwhile” and what the “system” is. You plug in your own values. If a system doesn’t align with the life you want - whether you’re coerced into it or not - you don’t have to support it. The logic is about your agency. If you’re stuck in a system you didn’t choose, the question is: What can you do to change your situation? What kind of a sub-system can you adopt? The statement doesn’t demand loyalty. It’s about recognizing what truly supports the life you want and acting on that - whether that means surrendering, adapting, resisting, or leaving. It’s always about your judgment.