After many years, at last I have become sufficiently cantankerous that one egregiously stupid post to c/showerthoughts is enough to make me block someone.

    • Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Can’t remember the last time I saw a shower thought in this community. This is just an opinion community in my eyes.

  • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    If it’s a 3-hour-old account, I don’t worry about it.

    If they have extensive post history and it doesn’t seem awfully toxic, and their modlog doesn’t indicate that this is a habit for them, then I might just assume they’re having a bad day and let it slide this time while hiding the thread.

    It usually doesn’t take many repeats of them posting about kids of rich people street racing or a single mother asking about her teenage son’s erections or whatever before I go “this guy again??” At that point I just block them.

    • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If it’s just the main post, I get it. If it continues in the comment replies, it’s more than just a bad day.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’d even argue that it’s a sign of strength, to be able to recognize behavior that you perceive as toxic and block/avoid wankers who display such behavior.

  • Agrivar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m not sure, but it feels like a LOT of trolls test the waters of Lemmy by posting their nonsense in this comm.

  • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    You’re probably better off auditing a University course then, instead of exchanging ideas on Lemmy.

      • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not so dumb actually. You take whatever course you want for free, get to listen to very smart people that know the topic, and probably learn something. What’s the downside?

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Out of all the communities where I’ve seen people complain about how well posts fit the theme, this one (along with the reddit version) confused me the most. Random thoughts aren’t random enough? What?

    It feels like first world problems: extreme edition.

    But I usually browse by all, so maybe I’m missing something fundamental.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Has the world as a wholeprogressed to the point that we couldn’t consider all of everything on Lemmy to be first world problems?

      How much of a presence do non-first-world people have on Lemmy?

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        They are posted about often enough. Though I guess a lot of them are litterally caused by the first world.

        Though going by “first world problem” meaning “problem that would be trivial if you had real problems”, some of the mod/admin drama is relevant, as it’s about censorship and what is or isn’t allowed at a community or instance level rather than individual.

        Edit: Not really arguing against your point here btw, just discussing, as I’d grant the point overall 🙂

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have been broadening my criteria. Some things are casual conversation and if a person is responding like comments are about something is a statement about the definitive definition of something and its like ugh. im sick of this.