If the threat of violence from another user directed at me had happened in a .zip instance and I had gotten banned instead of them, I’d be making the same accusation. It happened on piefed, though, no need for hypotheticals.
If the threat of violence from another user directed at me had happened in a .zip instance and I had gotten banned instead of them, I’d be making the same accusation.
So you don’t apparently expect lemmy.zip to respond to users like that, but you do in piefed.social? What? Because the lemmy.zip user did it on a remote community? Also, how do you know the instance ban and community ban are directly connected?
Also, whether or not you characterise it as a threat (I think it’s unsavoury and emotive and violent rhetoric, but not really a threat as such unless you specifically plan to go to Poland or something) - it doesn’t automatically make them or someone a nazi.
You can just say “it’s not that bad to threaten violence to communists” or “I disagree with piefed being a Nazi-bar instance” instead of playing rhetorical and asking 12 questions per comment, we’re gonna move on much faster.
I’m pointing out your double standards when judging instances, and your accusation - even if entirely true, doesn’t remotely meet the threshold of being nazi at all.
As I said: Also, whether or not you characterise it as a threat (I think it’s unsavoury and emotive and violent rhetoric, but not really a threat as such unless you specifically plan to go to Poland or something) - it doesn’t automatically make them or someone a nazi.
And you’re not answering my question: And can you tell me why you don’t also make these same claims to lemmy.zip since the user is from there?
If the threat of violence from another user directed at me had happened in a .zip instance and I had gotten banned instead of them, I’d be making the same accusation. It happened on piefed, though, no need for hypotheticals.
So you don’t apparently expect lemmy.zip to respond to users like that, but you do in piefed.social? What? Because the lemmy.zip user did it on a remote community? Also, how do you know the instance ban and community ban are directly connected?
Also, whether or not you characterise it as a threat (I think it’s unsavoury and emotive and violent rhetoric, but not really a threat as such unless you specifically plan to go to Poland or something) - it doesn’t automatically make them or someone a nazi.
You can just say “it’s not that bad to threaten violence to communists” or “I disagree with piefed being a Nazi-bar instance” instead of playing rhetorical and asking 12 questions per comment, we’re gonna move on much faster.
I’m pointing out your double standards when judging instances, and your accusation - even if entirely true, doesn’t remotely meet the threshold of being nazi at all.
As the poem goes, “first they came for the communists”
Why did they come for the communists first? And who did?
So anyone who is rude to a communist is automatically a nazi? Is that your genuine position?
And can you tell me why you don’t also make these same claims to lemmy.zip?
Being rude = threat of violence?
I’ll write it one more time: if an instance bans a communist but not the person threatening said person with violence, it’s a Nazi-friendly community
Then this equally applies to lemmy.zip, presumably. But apparently it doesn’t.
As I said: Also, whether or not you characterise it as a threat (I think it’s unsavoury and emotive and violent rhetoric, but not really a threat as such unless you specifically plan to go to Poland or something) - it doesn’t automatically make them or someone a nazi.
And you’re not answering my question: And can you tell me why you don’t also make these same claims to lemmy.zip since the user is from there?
Disengage