• witten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s also not particularly decentralized / federated, despite what their marketing might say.

            • witten@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Cool! So can you point me at a non-bsky.app instance running the full BlueSky stack that federates with bsky.app and continues working even if bsky.app disappears or defederates with them?

              • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                So, bluesky doesn’t work the same as the fediverse, bsky.app is an appview. It doesn’t federate, it just aggregates data and indexes it. A PDS stores data.

                If you went to deer.social, and chose something like bsky.aenead.net as your hosting provider, you won’t be using any bluesky infrastructure.

                • witten@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  But then will it still federate with Bluesky infrastructure and data?

                  Let me know if I’m being unreasonably Mastodon-centric here, but I guess my standard is if I can own* my own infrastructure but still federate data with the rest of the world. Without that federation, it’s cute but doesn’t really feel or act like the fediverse, you know?

                  * Or use one of many trusted providers.