According to the authors of the concept, if the resilience of a satellite constellation is ensured by its sheer number, then the response should be a weapon cheap enough to destroy satellites faster than SpaceX can launch new ones.

Smells of the good old forgeting that the target wont just sit by

At least they arent putting everything in one basket this time with physical destruction being the last option

Whats a satellite constallation destroyer but a anti ICBM weapon under a diffrent name?

What better way to prevent war then ensureing your primary enemy is fiscally , demographically and politically unable to fight?

Let alone militarily

Last time i checked the idea was more to move stuff to asia to counter china

So its not so much reduce buget as not increaseing it even quicker

When the gas station with a state has issues supplying gas